bg-arrow-down icon-arrow-up icon-back-to-top icon-linkedin icon-menu icon-search icon-twitter logo-white slider-arrow-left-gray slider-arrow-left slider-arrow-right-gray slider-arrow-right

New Legislation Would Turn Back the Clock on MMF Regulation

A host of political and procedural hurdles may have slowed the momentum for across-the-board rollbacks in Obama-era financial regulations that were promised early in the Trump administration.

Nonetheless, some money-market-fund industry observers hope the momentum will be regained at least enough to help push through bipartisan legislation introduced recently both in the U.S. Senate and in the House of Representatives that would rescind the VNAV requirement for institutional prime and tax-exempt municipal money funds.
Senate bill S.1117 – the “Consumer Financial Choice and Capital Markets Protection Act of 2017” – sponsored by Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and co-sponsored by colleagues Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), and Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and the nearly identical House version, H.R. 2319, sponsored by Keith Rothfus (R-Pa.) and co-sponsored by Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) and Steve Stivers (R-Ohio), are intended “to help municipalities, schools, and hospitals once again access low-cost capital for publicly-beneficial investments,” their sponsors contend. Both mirror legislation introduced in the prior congressional session, although only the House bill was given a formal committee hearing at the time and was tabled thereafter.

[…] “We’re delighted the bill has been introduced,” said Tony Carfang, managing director at Novantas’ Treasury Strategies. “It does just what we recommended in a white paper, ‘Money-Market Regulation: Winners, Losers, and Long-Term Consequences,’” which documents, Carfang said, “the immense damage from the poorly-conceived MMF regulation, in particular to the private and municipal sectors.”

For more information, contact Novantas Marketing

+1 (212) 901-2772

Please enter your email for verification: